This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Amiodarone to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation

Authoring team

This study was an open-label, randomised, prospective, multicenter trial investigation of the comparative efficacy of amiodarone versus sotalol or propafenone in the prevention of recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

The study enrolled 403 patients who had had at least one episode of atrial fibrillation within the previous six months.

The patient were initially randomised to amiodarone (201) or sotalol/propafenone. Those randomised to sotalol/propafenone underwent a second randomisation to determine whether they received sotalol (101) or propafenone (101); if the first drug was unsuccessful the second agent was prescribed.

Loading of the drugs was performed as usual. When required, electrical cardioversion was performed witin 21 days of randomisation.

Patients were followed up for a mean of 16 months.

Reference:

  • 1) Denis Roy, Mario Talajic, Paul Dorian, Stuart Connolly, Mark J. Eisenberg, Martin Green, Teresa Kus, Jean Lambert, Marc Dubuc, Pierre Gagne, Stanley Nattel, Bernard Thibault, for the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. (2000) Amiodarone to Prevent Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med 342, 913-20

Related pages

Create an account to add page annotations

Add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation, such as a web address or phone number. This information will always be displayed when you visit this page

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.